Paolo Carlini writes:
> Thanks Jakub for taking care of this.
Indeed, and sorry for the breakage. Nothing of the sort turned up on
x86_64-linux testing.
Rainer
--
-
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Biel
Thanks Jakub for taking care of this.
Paolo.
Il 28/02/2012 10:19, Jakub Jelinek ha scritto:
>>> > > - $(EGREP) -v '#(#| |$$)' $@.tmp | \
>>> > > + $(EGREP) -v '^[ ]*#(#| |$$)' $@.tmp | \
>> >
>> > I don't know this part very well, so I wonder why you have to remove
>> > comments at all... hence I wonder if sed 's/##.*//;
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 09:57:38AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 28/02/2012 09:50, Jakub Jelinek ha scritto:
> > - $(EGREP) -v '#(#| |$$)' $@.tmp | \
> > + $(EGREP) -v '^[ ]*#(#| |$$)' $@.tmp | \
>
> I don't know this part very well, so I wonder why you have to remove
> comments at
Il 28/02/2012 09:50, Jakub Jelinek ha scritto:
> - $(EGREP) -v '#(#| |$$)' $@.tmp | \
> + $(EGREP) -v '^[ ]*#(#| |$$)' $@.tmp | \
I don't know this part very well, so I wonder why you have to remove
comments at all... hence I wonder if sed 's/##.*//;s/# .*//;s/#$//'
(alternation i
Hi!
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 03:28:32PM -0800, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:12:33 +0100
> Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> > and $(EGREP) -v '#(#| |$$)' just throws away the whole
> > };# Appended to version file.
> > line. I wonder if
> > sed -e 's/#[# $].*$//'
> > wouldn't be better
