Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>Hi!
>
>This PR is about what I understood (can't reproduce, seems ltoish)
>about reassoc now creating say _24 = (int) 0; with _Bool 0, and
>forwprop ICEing on that.
>
>The patch fixes forwprop not to ICE on it (I think we don't require
>the IL to be always folded), and reasso
Hi!
This PR is about what I understood (can't reproduce, seems ltoish)
about reassoc now creating say _24 = (int) 0; with _Bool 0, and
forwprop ICEing on that.
The patch fixes forwprop not to ICE on it (I think we don't require
the IL to be always folded), and reassoc not to create it in this cas
