On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 12:38:30PM +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> > Rather than adding do_pending_stack_adjust () in all the places, especially
>> > when it isn't clear whether emit_conditional_move will be called at all and
>> > wheth
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 12/02/13 15:51, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 12:38:30PM +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > > > Rather than adding do_pending_stack_adjust () in all the places,
> > > > especially
> > > > when it isn't clear whether emit_conditi
On 12/02/13 15:51, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 12:38:30PM +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
Rather than adding do_pending_stack_adjust () in all the places, especially
when it isn't clear whether emit_conditional_move will be called at all and
whether it will actually do do_pendi
Hi!
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 12:38:30PM +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > Rather than adding do_pending_stack_adjust () in all the places, especially
> > when it isn't clear whether emit_conditional_move will be called at all and
> > whether it will actually do do_pending_stack_adjust (), I chose to
> Rather than adding do_pending_stack_adjust () in all the places, especially
> when it isn't clear whether emit_conditional_move will be called at all and
> whether it will actually do do_pending_stack_adjust (), I chose to add
> two new functions to save/restore the pending stack adjustment state
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>Hi!
>
>The following testcase ICEs because expand_cond_expr_using_cmove
>calls emit_conditional_move (which calls do_pending_stack_adjust
>under some circumstances), but when that fails, just removes all the
>insns generated by emit_conditional_move (and perhaps some earlier
Hi!
The following testcase ICEs because expand_cond_expr_using_cmove
calls emit_conditional_move (which calls do_pending_stack_adjust
under some circumstances), but when that fails, just removes all the
insns generated by emit_conditional_move (and perhaps some earlier ones
too), thus it removes a
