On Dez 12 2024, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> The intent was to test %cN because %N doesn't DTRT on various targets.
> I have a patch to add %ccN support which should then work even on riscv
> hopefully, but unfortunately it hasn't been fully reviewed yet.
That didn't change toplevel-asm-1, so the failu
On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 06:05:31PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Don't use 'c' modifier with a symbolic address. The riscv target doesn't
> accept it as a CONSTANT_ADDRESS_P and doesn't support 'c' with SYMBOL_REF.
>
> * c-c++-common/toplevel-asm-1.c: Remove 'c' from %3 and %4.
The intent
Don't use 'c' modifier with a symbolic address. The riscv target doesn't
accept it as a CONSTANT_ADDRESS_P and doesn't support 'c' with SYMBOL_REF.
* c-c++-common/toplevel-asm-1.c: Remove 'c' from %3 and %4.
---
gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/toplevel-asm-1.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insert
