On Fri, 4 Dec 2015, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 09:15:25AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > + modified one, up to and including last_bb, to be executed even if
> > > + they would not be in the original program. If the value ranges of
> > > + assignment lhs' in those bbs we
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 09:15:25AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > +modified one, up to and including last_bb, to be executed even if
> > +they would not be in the original program. If the value ranges of
> > +assignment lhs' in those bbs were dependent on the conditions
> > +guar
On Thu, 3 Dec 2015, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As mentioned in the PR, maybe_optimize_range_tests considers basic blocks
> with not just the final GIMPLE_COND (or for last_bb store feeding into PHI),
> but also assign stmts that don't trap, don't have side-effects and where
> the SSA_NAMEs th
Hi!
As mentioned in the PR, maybe_optimize_range_tests considers basic blocks
with not just the final GIMPLE_COND (or for last_bb store feeding into PHI),
but also assign stmts that don't trap, don't have side-effects and where
the SSA_NAMEs they set are used only in their own bb.
Now, if we decid
