On Oct 19, 2015, at 12:46 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
Ok. Does this need to go into the gcc-5 release branch as well? If so, ok
there too. Thanks.
>>> I think there is no need for it.
>>
>> It is also need for gcc-5. I am backporting it now.
>
> This is what I checked into gcc-5-branch.
Tha
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 12:39 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 12:15 AM, Mikhail Maltsev wrote:
>> On 07/17/2015 07:46 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
>>> On Jul 17, 2015, at 2:28 AM, Mikhail Maltsev wrote:
The following code (reduced from wide-int.h) is rejected by Intel C++
Compile
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 12:15 AM, Mikhail Maltsev wrote:
> On 07/17/2015 07:46 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
>> On Jul 17, 2015, at 2:28 AM, Mikhail Maltsev wrote:
>>> The following code (reduced from wide-int.h) is rejected by Intel C++
>>> Compiler (EDG-based):
>>
>> So, could you test this with the to
On 07/17/2015 07:46 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Jul 17, 2015, at 2:28 AM, Mikhail Maltsev wrote:
>> The following code (reduced from wide-int.h) is rejected by Intel C++
>> Compiler (EDG-based):
>
> So, could you test this with the top of the tree compiler and file a bug
> report against g++ for i
On Jul 17, 2015, at 2:28 AM, Mikhail Maltsev wrote:
> The following code (reduced from wide-int.h) is rejected by Intel C++ Compiler
> (EDG-based):
So, could you test this with the top of the tree compiler and file a bug report
against g++ for it, if it seems to not work right. If that bug repo
Hi, all!
The following code (reduced from wide-int.h) is rejected by Intel C++ Compiler
(EDG-based):
$ cat genpreds1_min.cc
template
class A;
template
struct B;
template
struct C;
template <>
template
struct C >
{
template
A >
m_fn(T);
};
template
template
A >
C >::m_fn (
