On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 12:29:31PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 11:20:29AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > There are many more
> > test cases that forget the "inline" and filter the warning with
> > "-Wno-attributes". I'll post an add-on patch later after testing
> > it.
>
On 06/01/2015 10:39 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> always_inline attribute is meaningful only for functions declared
> inline, and the compiler even warns about this, so it is unclear
> to me why the tests are attempting to use that.
>
> 2015-06-01 Jakub Jelinek
>
> * gcc.target/s39
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 11:20:29AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 10:39:34AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > always_inline attribute is meaningful only for functions declared
> > inline, and the compiler even warns about this, so it is unclear
> > to me why the tests are attem
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 10:39:34AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> always_inline attribute is meaningful only for functions declared
> inline, and the compiler even warns about this, so it is unclear
> to me why the tests are attempting to use that.
Since Gcc emits just a cryptic warning and not an
Hi!
always_inline attribute is meaningful only for functions declared
inline, and the compiler even warns about this, so it is unclear
to me why the tests are attempting to use that.
2015-06-01 Jakub Jelinek
* gcc.target/s390/hotpatch-compile-15.c: Remove dg-prune-output
direc
