On 14/11/18 20:26 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 14/11/18 10:31 +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 at 23:58, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Since a big_block rounds up the size to a multiple of big_block::min it
is wrong to assert that the supplied number of bytes equals the
big_bloc
On 14/11/18 10:31 +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 at 23:58, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Since a big_block rounds up the size to a multiple of big_block::min it
is wrong to assert that the supplied number of bytes equals the
big_block's size(). Add big_block::alloc_size(size_t) to
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 at 23:58, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> Since a big_block rounds up the size to a multiple of big_block::min it
> is wrong to assert that the supplied number of bytes equals the
> big_block's size(). Add big_block::alloc_size(size_t) to calculate the
> allocated size consistently,
@@ -932,8 +946,7 @@ namespace pmr
}
void
- __pool_resource::deallocate(void* p, size_t bytes [[maybe_unused]],
- size_t alignment [[maybe_unused]])
+ __pool_resource::deallocate(void* p, size_t bytes, size_t alignment)
{
const auto it
= std::lower_bou
Since a big_block rounds up the size to a multiple of big_block::min it
is wrong to assert that the supplied number of bytes equals the
big_block's size(). Add big_block::alloc_size(size_t) to calculate the
allocated size consistently, and add comments to the code.
* src/c++17/memory_reso
