On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:40 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> [ was: Re: [PATCH, stage1] Make parloops gate more strict ]
> On 19-03-15 10:00, Richard Biener wrote:
Yeah - it makes the -fdump-passes "hack" more pervasive throughout
>>the compiler.
>>
>>I suppose it should instea
[ was: Re: [PATCH, stage1] Make parloops gate more strict ]
On 19-03-15 10:00, Richard Biener wrote:
Yeah - it makes the -fdump-passes "hack" more pervasive throughout
>>the compiler.
>>
>>I suppose it should instead build & push a "dummy" sturct function.
>>
>
>Like this?
Looks good to me.
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 05/29/2013 02:11 PM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
>>
>> This patch re-enables -fdump-passes. It had stopped working because
>> dump_passes was changed to use the FOR_EACH_DEFINED_FUNCTION iterator,
>> however, functions are not marked as defined until
On 05/29/2013 02:11 PM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
This patch re-enables -fdump-passes. It had stopped working because
dump_passes was changed to use the FOR_EACH_DEFINED_FUNCTION iterator,
however, functions are not marked as defined until after dump_passes
is called, in cgraph_analyze_functions. Fix
This patch re-enables -fdump-passes. It had stopped working because
dump_passes was changed to use the FOR_EACH_DEFINED_FUNCTION iterator,
however, functions are not marked as defined until after dump_passes
is called, in cgraph_analyze_functions. Fixed by iterating over all
functions.
Bootstrappe