Hi!
As mentioned in the PR, we ICE on the following zero sized array
initializers, while domain is non-NULL and TYPE_MIN_VALUE is size_int (0),
TYPE_MAX_VALUE is NULL and not INTEGER_CST compare_tree_int assumes it is.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
2018-04-
On April 6, 2018 6:10:14 PM GMT+02:00, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>Hi!
>
>As mentioned in the PR, we ICE on the following zero sized array
>initializers, while domain is non-NULL and TYPE_MIN_VALUE is size_int
>(0),
>TYPE_MAX_VALUE is NULL and not INTEGER_CST compare_tree_int assumes it
>is.
>
>Bootstra
On Wed, 22 Nov 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On this testcase we get (vec_series (reg: ebp) (const_int 1))
> in NOTE_INSN_CALL_ARG_LOCATION because the vector isn't live anywhere else.
> Right now we do not have a good story for providing values of optimized
> out vectors, so just punting
Hi!
On this testcase we get (vec_series (reg: ebp) (const_int 1))
in NOTE_INSN_CALL_ARG_LOCATION because the vector isn't live anywhere else.
Right now we do not have a good story for providing values of optimized
out vectors, so just punting on it like on other VEC_* codes is sufficient.
For the
On 11/06/2017 02:35 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> My recent changes to const_ok_for_output_1 to allow UNSPEC if target hook
> says it is ok for debug regressed the following testcase, where creative
> simplify-rtx.c changes result in (const (neg (unspec ... UNSPEC_GOTOFF)))
> being emitted an
Hi!
My recent changes to const_ok_for_output_1 to allow UNSPEC if target hook
says it is ok for debug regressed the following testcase, where creative
simplify-rtx.c changes result in (const (neg (unspec ... UNSPEC_GOTOFF)))
being emitted and the backend not being able to assemble that (assembler
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 11:42 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The following C and Ada testcases show ICE due to endless recursion in
> dwarf2out.c. The problem is that when processing BLOCK_NONLOCALIZED_VARS,
> we want to treat all the FUNCTION_DECLs in there as mere declarations,
> but gen_sub
Hi!
The following C and Ada testcases show ICE due to endless recursion in
dwarf2out.c. The problem is that when processing BLOCK_NONLOCALIZED_VARS,
we want to treat all the FUNCTION_DECLs in there as mere declarations,
but gen_subprogram_die does:
int declaration = (current_function_decl != de
On 03/29/2017 01:42 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
When a C++17 inline static data member has a redundant out-of-class
deprecated redeclaration, we can end up with 2 DW_TAG_variable in
DW_TAG_compile_unit, one DW_AT_declaration and one with DW_AT_specification
pointing to it (the latter emitted fo
Hi!
When a C++17 inline static data member has a redundant out-of-class
deprecated redeclaration, we can end up with 2 DW_TAG_variable in
DW_TAG_compile_unit, one DW_AT_declaration and one with DW_AT_specification
pointing to it (the latter emitted for the redeclaration), before
gen_member_die can
When testing with -g g++.dg/ext/attr-alias-3.C ICEs because we mess
up the context of class-scope vars with aliases. The following fixes
this.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2015-09-21 Richard Biener
* passes.c (rest_of_decl_compilation): Do
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As mentioned in the PR, on the following testcase we ICE, because for
> # DEBUG D#2 => b
> # DEBUG D#1 => a[D#2].t
> # DEBUG c => D#1
> during expansion we get the a[D#2].t added as MEM_EXPR of a MEM, and because
> we can't mem
Hi!
As mentioned in the PR, on the following testcase we ICE, because for
# DEBUG D#2 => b
# DEBUG D#1 => a[D#2].t
# DEBUG c => D#1
during expansion we get the a[D#2].t added as MEM_EXPR of a MEM, and because
we can't mem_loc_descriptor that MEM (I'll post separately a trunk only
patch that
On 10/01/2014 04:39 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
Ok except for the MEM_REF change for 4.9/4.8 (where the mem_loc_descriptor
fix also went)?
Yes.
Jason
Hi!
Since r214899 we ICE on the following testcase, because when
mem_loc_descriptor gives up on a complex TLS related address that
can't be (easily) delegitimized, we try to build location description
from MEM_EXPR, but in this case it is a TARGET_MEM_REF which wasn't handled.
I've implemented mor
15 matches
Mail list logo