Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:12:40PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> When testing the patch the overflow-2.c testcase didn't exist yet,
>> nor was ubsan on -m32 actually ever reporting overflows on the DImode
>> multiplication (it simply expanded it as normal DImode multiplicati
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:12:40PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> When testing the patch the overflow-2.c testcase didn't exist yet,
> nor was ubsan on -m32 actually ever reporting overflows on the DImode
> multiplication (it simply expanded it as normal DImode multiplication with
> no overflow chec
