Re: [PATCH] Fix another ubsan_encode_value related ICE (PR sanitizer/81209)

2017-06-27 Thread Richard Biener
On Tue, 27 Jun 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > Apparently the pr81125.C testcase ICEs on Darwin, but not on Linux, > the difference is that on Darwin ctors/dtors aren't deduplicated due to > lack of flexibility of the object format. I've managed to reproduce > also on Linux with a virtual b

[PATCH] Fix another ubsan_encode_value related ICE (PR sanitizer/81209)

2017-06-26 Thread Jakub Jelinek
Hi! Apparently the pr81125.C testcase ICEs on Darwin, but not on Linux, the difference is that on Darwin ctors/dtors aren't deduplicated due to lack of flexibility of the object format. I've managed to reproduce also on Linux with a virtual base and -fno-declone-ctor-dtor. The problem was that be