Re: [PATCH] Fix allocation of reg_known_value

2012-11-30 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote: > This one-liner causes following runtime test failure [1] for > alphaev68-linux-gnu: > > FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/save_1.f90 execution, -O2 > FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/save_1.f90 execution, -

Re: [PATCH] Fix allocation of reg_known_value

2012-11-30 Thread Steven Bosscher
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote: > They are r188868 and r189325. This'd be the diff: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/trunk/gcc/alias.c?r1=188448&r2=189325&pathrev=189325 Ciao! Steven

Re: [PATCH] Fix allocation of reg_known_value

2012-11-30 Thread Steven Bosscher
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Steven Bosscher wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> Il 29/11/2012 23:47, Uros Bizjak ha scritto: This one-liner causes following runtime test failure [1] for alphaev68-

Re: [PATCH] Fix allocation of reg_known_value

2012-11-30 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote: This one-liner causes following runtime test failure [1] for alphaev68-linux-gnu: FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/save_1.f90 execution, -O2 FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/save_1.f90 execution, -O2 -

Re: [PATCH] Fix allocation of reg_known_value

2012-11-30 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Steven Bosscher wrote: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> Il 29/11/2012 23:47, Uros Bizjak ha scritto: >>> This one-liner causes following runtime test failure [1] for >>> alphaev68-linux-gnu: >>> >>> FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execut

Re: [PATCH] Fix allocation of reg_known_value

2012-11-30 Thread Steven Bosscher
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 29/11/2012 23:47, Uros Bizjak ha scritto: >> This one-liner causes following runtime test failure [1] for >> alphaev68-linux-gnu: >> >> FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/save_1.f90 execution, -O2 >> FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/ex

Re: [PATCH] Fix allocation of reg_known_value

2012-11-30 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Il 29/11/2012 23:47, Uros Bizjak ha scritto: > This one-liner causes following runtime test failure [1] for > alphaev68-linux-gnu: > > FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/save_1.f90 execution, -O2 > FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/save_1.f90 execution, -O2 > -fomit-frame-pointer -finli

Re: [PATCH] Fix allocation of reg_known_value

2012-11-29 Thread Uros Bizjak
Hello! > When changing reg_known_value to a VEC, Steven sneaked in a small > semantic change. That change has the advantage of improving compilation > time substantially on some testcases (including PR55489), but it is a > bit heavy-handed: it also makes set_known_reg_value a no-op, while > get_k

Re: [PATCH] Fix allocation of reg_known_value

2012-11-27 Thread Steven Bosscher
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > When changing reg_known_value to a VEC, Steven sneaked in a small > semantic change. I don't sneak, I just tend to do stupid things from time to time ;-) Thanks for catching this, and sorry for the breakage! Ciao! Steven

[PATCH] Fix allocation of reg_known_value

2012-11-27 Thread Paolo Bonzini
When changing reg_known_value to a VEC, Steven sneaked in a small semantic change. That change has the advantage of improving compilation time substantially on some testcases (including PR55489), but it is a bit heavy-handed: it also makes set_known_reg_value a no-op, while get_known_reg_value wil