Re: [PATCH] Fix REG_EQUAL note in x86 -m8bit-idiv code

2017-09-30 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 10:59 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > While working on the following patch, I've discovered that the REG_EQUAL > notes for DImode signed/unsigned division/modulo are wrong, there is > e.g. (div:SI (reg:DI ...) (reg:DI ...)). > > Fixed thusly, bootstrapped/regtested on x8

[PATCH] Fix REG_EQUAL note in x86 -m8bit-idiv code

2017-09-29 Thread Jakub Jelinek
Hi! While working on the following patch, I've discovered that the REG_EQUAL notes for DImode signed/unsigned division/modulo are wrong, there is e.g. (div:SI (reg:DI ...) (reg:DI ...)). Fixed thusly, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk? 2017-09-29 Jakub Jelinek