On 01/13/15 09:11, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 02:29:53PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
On 01/12/15 12:59, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
As mentioned in the PR, giving up for all vector mode extensions
is unnecessary, but unlike scalar integer extensions, where the low part
of the extende
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 02:29:53PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 01/12/15 12:59, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >Hi!
> >
> >As mentioned in the PR, giving up for all vector mode extensions
> >is unnecessary, but unlike scalar integer extensions, where the low part
> >of the extended value is the original val
On 01/12/15 12:59, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
As mentioned in the PR, giving up for all vector mode extensions
is unnecessary, but unlike scalar integer extensions, where the low part
of the extended value is the original value, for vectors this is not true,
thus the old value is lost. Which mean
Hi!
As mentioned in the PR, giving up for all vector mode extensions
is unnecessary, but unlike scalar integer extensions, where the low part
of the extended value is the original value, for vectors this is not true,
thus the old value is lost. Which means we can perform REE, but only if
all uses
