Re: [PATCH] Fix PR90316

2019-10-30 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On 2019-10-30T12:19:28+0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 11:57:12AM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote: >> ..., and when building gcc-9-branch with >> '--enable-checking=yes,extra,rtl' (apparently I'm the only one doing >> that, huh?), runs into the following (at least I suppose

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR90316

2019-10-30 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 11:57:12AM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > ..., and when building gcc-9-branch with > '--enable-checking=yes,extra,rtl' (apparently I'm the only one doing > that, huh?), runs into the following (at least I suppose that's what's I'm testing release branches with ../configure

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR90316

2019-10-30 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On 2019-05-06T11:36:22+0200, Richard Biener wrote: > On Sat, 4 May 2019, Richard Sandiford wrote: >> Richard Biener writes: >> > On Fri, 3 May 2019, Richard Biener wrote: >> >> I am testing the following patch [...] ... which apparently also got backported to gcc-9-branch eventually... >>

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR90316

2019-05-06 Thread Richard Biener
On Sat, 4 May 2019, Richard Sandiford wrote: > Richard Biener writes: > > On Fri, 3 May 2019, Richard Biener wrote: > > > >> > >> I am testing the following patch to remove the code determining > >> the target virtual operand to walk to and instead compute it > >> based on the immediate dominato

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR90316

2019-05-04 Thread Richard Sandiford
Richard Biener writes: > On Fri, 3 May 2019, Richard Biener wrote: > >> >> I am testing the following patch to remove the code determining >> the target virtual operand to walk to and instead compute it >> based on the immediate dominator which we will reach anyways >> (or a dominating block) dur

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR90316

2019-05-03 Thread Richard Biener
On Fri, 3 May 2019, Richard Biener wrote: > > I am testing the following patch to remove the code determining > the target virtual operand to walk to and instead compute it > based on the immediate dominator which we will reach anyways > (or a dominating block) during maybe_skip_until. > > More

[PATCH] Fix PR90316

2019-05-03 Thread Richard Biener
I am testing the following patch to remove the code determining the target virtual operand to walk to and instead compute it based on the immediate dominator which we will reach anyways (or a dominating block) during maybe_skip_until. More simplifying might be possible but I'm trying to keep the