On Aug 1, 2017, at 10:56 AM, Bill Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Aug 1, 2017, at 8:50 AM, Bill Schmidt wrote:
>>
>> On Aug 1, 2017, at 7:44 AM, Bill Schmidt wrote:
>>>
On Aug 1, 2017, at 3:46 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Bill Schmidt
wro
On Aug 2, 2017, at 3:09 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Bill Schmidt
> wrote:
>> On Aug 1, 2017, at 8:50 AM, Bill Schmidt wrote:
>>>
>>> On Aug 1, 2017, at 7:44 AM, Bill Schmidt
>>> wrote:
>
> On Aug 1, 2017, at 3:46 AM, Richard Biener
> wro
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Bill Schmidt
wrote:
> On Aug 1, 2017, at 8:50 AM, Bill Schmidt wrote:
>>
>> On Aug 1, 2017, at 7:44 AM, Bill Schmidt wrote:
>>>
On Aug 1, 2017, at 3:46 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Bill Schmidt
wrote:
On Aug 1, 2017, at 8:50 AM, Bill Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Aug 1, 2017, at 7:44 AM, Bill Schmidt wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Aug 1, 2017, at 3:46 AM, Richard Biener
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Bill Schmidt
>>> wrote:
> On Jul 31, 2017, at 8:19 AM, Bill Schmidt
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Bill Schmidt
wrote:
> On Aug 1, 2017, at 7:44 AM, Bill Schmidt wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Aug 1, 2017, at 3:46 AM, Richard Biener
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Bill Schmidt
>>> wrote:
> On Jul 31, 2017, at 8:19 AM, Bill Schmidt
> w
On Aug 1, 2017, at 7:44 AM, Bill Schmidt wrote:
>
>>
>> On Aug 1, 2017, at 3:46 AM, Richard Biener
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Bill Schmidt
>> wrote:
>>>
On Jul 31, 2017, at 8:19 AM, Bill Schmidt
wrote:
That would certainly be much simpler! I'll
> On Aug 1, 2017, at 3:46 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Bill Schmidt
> wrote:
>>
>>> On Jul 31, 2017, at 8:19 AM, Bill Schmidt
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> That would certainly be much simpler! I'll regstrap it and test it on the
>>> other
>>> occurrence I've found
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Bill Schmidt
wrote:
>
>> On Jul 31, 2017, at 8:19 AM, Bill Schmidt
>> wrote:
>>
>> That would certainly be much simpler! I'll regstrap it and test it on the
>> other
>> occurrence I've found to be certain.
>
> Unfortunately, this fails bootstrap:
>
> /home/wsch
> On Jul 31, 2017, at 8:19 AM, Bill Schmidt wrote:
>
> That would certainly be much simpler! I'll regstrap it and test it on the
> other
> occurrence I've found to be certain.
Unfortunately, this fails bootstrap:
/home/wschmidt/gcc/gcc-mainline-test/gcc/calls.c: In function 'rtx_def*
emit
That would certainly be much simpler! I'll regstrap it and test it on the other
occurrence I've found to be certain.
-- Bill
> On Jul 31, 2017, at 4:15 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 8:04 PM, Bill Schmidt
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> PR81354 identifies a latent bug that ca
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 8:04 PM, Bill Schmidt
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> PR81354 identifies a latent bug that can happen in SLSR since the
> conditional candidate support was first added. SLSR relies on the
> address of a GIMPLE PHI remaining constant during the course of the
> optimization pass, but it ne
Hi,
PR81354 identifies a latent bug that can happen in SLSR since the
conditional candidate support was first added. SLSR relies on the
address of a GIMPLE PHI remaining constant during the course of the
optimization pass, but it needs to split edges. The use of
make_single_succ_edge and reinsta
12 matches
Mail list logo