> On Nov 17, 2016, at 3:42 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:14 AM, Bill Schmidt
> wrote:
>>
>> Yes, the new predicate works fine. New patch below, bootstrapped and tested
>> on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu, with only the bb-slp-cond-1.c regressions
>> previously dis
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:14 AM, Bill Schmidt
wrote:
> On 11/16/16 9:08 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 9:03 PM, Bill Schmidt
>> wrote:
>>> - if ((any_pred_load_store || any_complicated_phi)
>>> - && !version_loop_for_if_conversion (loop))
>>> + /* Since we have no c
On 11/16/16 9:08 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 9:03 PM, Bill Schmidt
> wrote:
>> - if ((any_pred_load_store || any_complicated_phi)
>> - && !version_loop_for_if_conversion (loop))
>> + /* Since we have no cost model, always version loops if vectorization
>> + is e
Thanks, Richard! I'll follow up with these changes over the next day or
two. Appreciate all the help!
Bill
On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 16:08 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 9:03 PM, Bill Schmidt
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77848 identi
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 9:03 PM, Bill Schmidt
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77848 identifies a situation
> where if-conversion causes degradation when the if-converted loop is not
> subsequently vectorized. The if-conversion pass does not have a cost
> model to avo
Hi,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77848 identifies a situation
where if-conversion causes degradation when the if-converted loop is not
subsequently vectorized. The if-conversion pass does not have a cost
model to avoid such degradations. However, it does have a capability to
vers
