On Mon, 24 Feb 2014, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >
> > This addresses miscompilations caused by improperly mixing
> > -f[no-]strict-overflow units (and thus optimize <= 1 and optimize >= 2
> > units!). It does so by merging -f[no-]strict-overflow and the
> > related -f[no-]wrapv and -f[no-]trapv conser
>
> This addresses miscompilations caused by improperly mixing
> -f[no-]strict-overflow units (and thus optimize <= 1 and optimize >= 2
> units!). It does so by merging -f[no-]strict-overflow and the
> related -f[no-]wrapv and -f[no-]trapv conservatively, that is,
> if any unit uses (implicitely)
This addresses miscompilations caused by improperly mixing
-f[no-]strict-overflow units (and thus optimize <= 1 and optimize >= 2
units!). It does so by merging -f[no-]strict-overflow and the
related -f[no-]wrapv and -f[no-]trapv conservatively, that is,
if any unit uses (implicitely) -fno-strict