On Tue, 14 Aug 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
> Currently we can insert an initializer that performs a multiply in too
> small of a type for correctness. For now, detect the problem and avoid
> the optimization when this would happen. Eventually I will fix this up
> to cause the multiply to be
Currently we can insert an initializer that performs a multiply in too
small of a type for correctness. For now, detect the problem and avoid
the optimization when this would happen. Eventually I will fix this up
to cause the multiply to be performed in a sufficiently wide type.
Bootstrapped and
