Re: [PATCH] Fix PR52402

2012-02-28 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 05:58:14PM -0800, Mike Stump wrote: > On Feb 28, 2012, at 3:39 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > Here is a fix, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, > > ok for trunk? > > Sure, but, I can't find -Wpsabi in the docs. :-( If -Wno-abi works, at > least it is do

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR52402

2012-02-28 Thread Mike Stump
On Feb 28, 2012, at 3:39 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Here is a fix, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, > ok for trunk? Sure, but, I can't find -Wpsabi in the docs. :-( If -Wno-abi works, at least it is documented. Ok either way.

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR52402

2012-02-28 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 09:34:37PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 04:38:01PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote: > > This fixes PR52402 in a similar way as PR50444. IPA SRA needs to be > > careful about alignment when constructing accesses. > > > > Bootstrap and regtest pending

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR52402

2012-02-28 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 04:38:01PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote: > This fixes PR52402 in a similar way as PR50444. IPA SRA needs to be > careful about alignment when constructing accesses. > > Bootstrap and regtest pending on x86_64, any comments? The test fails on i386-linux, adding "-w -Wno-p

[PATCH] Fix PR52402

2012-02-27 Thread Richard Guenther
This fixes PR52402 in a similar way as PR50444. IPA SRA needs to be careful about alignment when constructing accesses. Bootstrap and regtest pending on x86_64, any comments? Thanks, Richard. 2012-02-27 Richard Guenther PR tree-optimization/52402 * ipa-prop.c (ipa_modify_ca