On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 7:22 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> Hi,
> The problem is that even though expand knows how to expand
> VEC_COND when there is no vcond_mask pattern,
> expand_vec_cond_expr_p returns false. So this patch allows
> expand_vec_cond_expr_p to try the next part of the function if t
Hi,
The problem is that even though expand knows how to expand
VEC_COND when there is no vcond_mask pattern,
expand_vec_cond_expr_p returns false. So this patch allows
expand_vec_cond_expr_p to try the next part of the function if there
is no vcond_mask pattern.
OK? Bootstrapped and tested on a