On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 7:22 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> > Full bootstrap + regtesting on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu is in progress.
>> > Is this patch OK if testing succeeds with no new regressions?
>>
>> ... ok. But please watch for fallout.
>
> I'd do a bootstrap with Ada enabled, the Ada compil
> > Full bootstrap + regtesting on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu is in progress.
> > Is this patch OK if testing succeeds with no new regressions?
>
> ... ok. But please watch for fallout.
I'd do a bootstrap with Ada enabled, the Ada compiler is the only serious user
of abnormal edges in GIMPLE on L
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 2:33 AM, Patrick Palka
wrote:
> PR 63748 reports a false-positive uninitialized warning under the
> presence of abnormal edges. The statements for which the uninitialized
> warnings are emitted all look like:
>
> buf_117(ab) = buf_317(D)(ab);
>
> This PR is similar to PR
PR 63748 reports a false-positive uninitialized warning under the
presence of abnormal edges. The statements for which the uninitialized
warnings are emitted all look like:
buf_117(ab) = buf_317(D)(ab);
This PR is similar to PR 57287 which also reports false-positive
uninitialized warnings und
