Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>Hi!
>
>gimple_goto_dest is is_gimple_val, so can be ADDR_EXPR (though just for
>bad
>testcases), and in that case we weren't walking it in some cases.
>
>I've tried to reject ADDR_EXPRs in gimple_goto_dest, but that turned
>out to
>be much larger patch and still incomplete.
>
Hi!
gimple_goto_dest is is_gimple_val, so can be ADDR_EXPR (though just for bad
testcases), and in that case we weren't walking it in some cases.
I've tried to reject ADDR_EXPRs in gimple_goto_dest, but that turned out to
be much larger patch and still incomplete.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_6
