On 11/28/2016 04:51 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/25/2016 07:02 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
On Nov 23 2016, Christophe Lyon wrote:
Since you committed this patch (r242733), I've noticed a regression:
gcc.dg/uninit-pred-6_c.c warning (test for warnings, line 43)
now fails on some arm targets, for
On 11/25/2016 07:02 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
On Nov 23 2016, Christophe Lyon wrote:
Since you committed this patch (r242733), I've noticed a regression:
gcc.dg/uninit-pred-6_c.c warning (test for warnings, line 43)
now fails on some arm targets, for instance arm-none-linux-gnueabihf
--with
On Nov 23 2016, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> Since you committed this patch (r242733), I've noticed a regression:
> gcc.dg/uninit-pred-6_c.c warning (test for warnings, line 43)
>
> now fails on some arm targets, for instance arm-none-linux-gnueabihf
> --with-cpu=cortex-a5 --with-fpu=vfpv3-d16-fp16
Hi Marek,
On 22 November 2016 at 01:02, Marek Polacek wrote:
> What seems like a typo caused an ICE here. We've got a vector of vectors here
> and we're trying to walk all the elements, so the second loop oughta use 'j'.
>
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?
>
> 2016-11-21
On 11/22/2016 02:49 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 04:02:40PM -0800, Marek Polacek wrote:
What seems like a typo caused an ICE here. We've got a vector of vectors here
and we're trying to walk all the elements, so the second loop oughta use 'j'.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 04:02:40PM -0800, Marek Polacek wrote:
> What seems like a typo caused an ICE here. We've got a vector of vectors here
> and we're trying to walk all the elements, so the second loop oughta use 'j'.
>
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?
>
> 2016-11-21
What seems like a typo caused an ICE here. We've got a vector of vectors here
and we're trying to walk all the elements, so the second loop oughta use 'j'.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?
2016-11-21 Marek Polacek
PR tree-optimization/78455
* tree-ssa-uni
