On 07/31/2018 04:04 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jul 2018, Andris Pavenis wrote:
On 07/27/2018 11:51 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
Richard Biener writes:
DJ, did you ever run the testsuite with a configuration that has LTO
enabled? I don't see any djgpp results posted to gcc-testresults.
Qu
On Sat, 28 Jul 2018, Andris Pavenis wrote:
> On 07/27/2018 11:51 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > Richard Biener writes:
> > > DJ, did you ever run the testsuite with a configuration that has LTO
> > > enabled? I don't see any djgpp results posted to gcc-testresults.
> > > Quick googling doesn't yield
On 07/27/2018 11:51 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
Richard Biener writes:
DJ, did you ever run the testsuite with a configuration that has LTO
enabled? I don't see any djgpp results posted to gcc-testresults.
Quick googling doesn't yield anything useful with regarding on how to
do actual testing with a
Richard Biener writes:
> DJ, did you ever run the testsuite with a configuration that has LTO
> enabled? I don't see any djgpp results posted to gcc-testresults.
> Quick googling doesn't yield anything useful with regarding on how to
> do actual testing with a cross so I only built a i686-pc-ms
This patch from jwjager...@gmail.com clones the fixes done for
mingw and darwin to make LTO work together with -g in GCC 8+.
It's said to build OK in a djgpp configuration and I expect similar
results as for mingw and darwin.
The original application the reporter ran into the issue with isn't
f
