Re: [PATCH] Fix ARM pic_add_dot_plus_eight + load peephole (PR target/52006)

2012-01-26 Thread Ramana Radhakrishnan
On 26 January 2012 10:47, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > On this testcase we ICE because we have > (insn 65 64 9 2 (set (reg/f:SI 2 r2 [141]) >        (unspec:SI [ >                (reg/f:SI 2 r2 [141]) >                (const_int 8 [0x8]) >                (const_int 1 [0x1]) >            ] UNSPEC

[PATCH] Fix ARM pic_add_dot_plus_eight + load peephole (PR target/52006)

2012-01-26 Thread Jakub Jelinek
Hi! On this testcase we ICE because we have (insn 65 64 9 2 (set (reg/f:SI 2 r2 [141]) (unspec:SI [ (reg/f:SI 2 r2 [141]) (const_int 8 [0x8]) (const_int 1 [0x1]) ] UNSPEC_PIC_BASE)) rh784748.i:13 187 {pic_add_dot_plus_eight}