On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:38:51PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> This removes a road-block towards fixing PR64715 - the gimplifier
> performing an undesired "simplification" of &X + CST to
> &MEM[&X, CST]. IMHO this is premature there.
>
> The fallout is small - two testcases are no longer si
This removes a road-block towards fixing PR64715 - the gimplifier
performing an undesired "simplification" of &X + CST to
&MEM[&X, CST]. IMHO this is premature there.
The fallout is small - two testcases are no longer simplified at -O0
(who cares), and devirt-40.C shows that SCEV adheres too clo
