Re: [PATCH] Don't add useless reverse_op vta equivalences (PR debug/52001)

2012-01-27 Thread Richard Guenther
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 10:03 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > When a VALUE contains already some constant location, it will be always > preferable to expressing it by some other expression - const (or some > similar reverse operation), so we just should point at adding the > reverse_op. > > Thi

[PATCH] Don't add useless reverse_op vta equivalences (PR debug/52001)

2012-01-26 Thread Jakub Jelinek
Hi! When a VALUE contains already some constant location, it will be always preferable to expressing it by some other expression - const (or some similar reverse operation), so we just should point at adding the reverse_op. This fixes the testcase from the PR on mips64-linux, bootstrapped/regtest