> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 07:23:33PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > > --- gcc/cgraphclones.c.jj 2015-01-09 21:59:44.0 +0100
> > > +++ gcc/cgraphclones.c2015-02-16 14:02:16.564725881 +0100
> > > @@ -577,7 +577,7 @@ cgraph_node::create_virtual_clone (vec > >char *name;
> > >
> > >
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 07:23:33PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > --- gcc/cgraphclones.c.jj 2015-01-09 21:59:44.0 +0100
> > +++ gcc/cgraphclones.c 2015-02-16 14:02:16.564725881 +0100
> > @@ -577,7 +577,7 @@ cgraph_node::create_virtual_clone (vec >char *name;
> >
> >if (!in_l
Hi,
> Hi!
>
> As discussed in the PR, in 4.9 we used to clone DECL_SECTION_NAME
> through using copy_node on the FUNCTION_DECL, and only in selected places
> (e.g. when creating artificial_thunk.*, or when creating virtual clones
> of DECL_ONE_ONLY functions) we used to explicitly clear DECL_SECTI
Hi!
As discussed in the PR, in 4.9 we used to clone DECL_SECTION_NAME
through using copy_node on the FUNCTION_DECL, and only in selected places
(e.g. when creating artificial_thunk.*, or when creating virtual clones
of DECL_ONE_ONLY functions) we used to explicitly clear DECL_SECTION_NAME.
In 5 th
