On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 06:54:05AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > What always matters is whether we take address of a packed structure
> > field/non-static data member or whether we just read that field.
> > The former should be warned about, the latter not.
> >
>
> How about this patch? It checks if
On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 5:20 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 04:48:38AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > When checking alignment of packed member, we should only check the
> > non-pointer data member.
> >
> > gcc/c-family/
> >
> > PR c++/88664
> > * c-family/c-warn.c (chec
On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 04:48:38AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> When checking alignment of packed member, we should only check the
> non-pointer data member.
>
> gcc/c-family/
>
> PR c++/88664
> * c-family/c-warn.c (check_alignment_of_packed_member): Only
> check the non-pointer data
When checking alignment of packed member, we should only check the
non-pointer data member.
gcc/c-family/
PR c++/88664
* c-family/c-warn.c (check_alignment_of_packed_member): Only
check the non-pointer data member.
gcc/testsuite/
PR c++/88664
* gcc.dg/pr8
