On Tue, 27 Mar 2012, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > Changelog:
> > * expmed.c (store_bit_field_1): Fix wordnum value for big endian targets
>
> The author line was missing so I put:
>
> 2012-03-27 Aurelien Buhrig
>
> PR middle-end/51893
> * expmed.c (store_bit_field_1): Fix wordnum val
> Changelog:
> * expmed.c (store_bit_field_1): Fix wordnum value for big endian targets
The author line was missing so I put:
2012-03-27 Aurelien Buhrig
PR middle-end/51893
* expmed.c (store_bit_field_1): Fix wordnum value for big-endian
targets.
> Will this fix be ba
>> Passes bootstrap and regression test powerpc64-linux.
>
> Thanks a lot, Alan!
>
> So, Aurelien, you only need to adjust the formatting of the patch and post a
> ChangeLog entry along with it. TIA.
>
Thanks Alan!
Bootstrap and regression test for m68k-elf ok, but I have trouble cross
compi
> Passes bootstrap and regression test powerpc64-linux.
Thanks a lot, Alan!
So, Aurelien, you only need to adjust the formatting of the patch and post a
ChangeLog entry along with it. TIA.
--
Eric Botcazou
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:53:07PM +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > This patch (for 4.6) fixes a wrong subword index computation in
> > store_bit_field_1 for big endian targets when value is at least 4 times
> > bigger than a word (DI REG value with HI words).
> >
> > It fixes a regression on gcc.c-
> This patch (for 4.6) fixes a wrong subword index computation in
> store_bit_field_1 for big endian targets when value is at least 4 times
> bigger than a word (DI REG value with HI words).
>
> It fixes a regression on gcc.c-torture/execute/bitfld-3.c for my current
> backend port.
>
> http://gcc.
Hi,
This patch (for 4.6) fixes a wrong subword index computation in
store_bit_field_1 for big endian targets when value is at least 4 times
bigger than a word (DI REG value with HI words).
It fixes a regression on gcc.c-torture/execute/bitfld-3.c for my current
backend port.
http://gcc.gnu.org/b
