On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> On 02 Dec 16:27, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>> >
>> > The problem is that conversion is supposed to be handled by
>> > vectorizable_conversion,
>> > but it fails to because it is not actually
On 02 Dec 16:27, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> >
> > The problem is that conversion is supposed to be handled by
> > vectorizable_conversion,
> > but it fails to because it is not actually a conversion. I suppose it
> > may be handled
> > in vectori
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> 2015-12-02 17:52 GMT+03:00 Richard Biener :
>> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Ilya Enkovich
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> When we use LTO for fortran we may have a mix 32bit and 1bit scalar
>>> booleans. It means we may have conversion of one
2015-12-02 17:52 GMT+03:00 Richard Biener :
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> When we use LTO for fortran we may have a mix 32bit and 1bit scalar
>> booleans. It means we may have conversion of one scalar type to another
>> which confuses vectorizer because val
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When we use LTO for fortran we may have a mix 32bit and 1bit scalar booleans.
> It means we may have conversion of one scalar type to another which confuses
> vectorizer because values with different scalar boolean type may get the
Ping
2015-11-23 16:05 GMT+03:00 Ilya Enkovich :
> Ping
>
> 2015-11-13 16:17 GMT+03:00 Ilya Enkovich :
>> 2015-11-13 13:03 GMT+03:00 Richard Biener :
>>> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Ilya Enkovich
>>> wrote:
Hi,
When we use LTO for fortran we may have a mix 32bit and 1bit scala
Ping
2015-11-13 16:17 GMT+03:00 Ilya Enkovich :
> 2015-11-13 13:03 GMT+03:00 Richard Biener :
>> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Ilya Enkovich
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> When we use LTO for fortran we may have a mix 32bit and 1bit scalar
>>> booleans. It means we may have conversion of one scal
2015-11-13 13:03 GMT+03:00 Richard Biener :
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> When we use LTO for fortran we may have a mix 32bit and 1bit scalar
>> booleans. It means we may have conversion of one scalar type to another
>> which confuses vectorizer because val
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When we use LTO for fortran we may have a mix 32bit and 1bit scalar booleans.
> It means we may have conversion of one scalar type to another which confuses
> vectorizer because values with different scalar boolean type may get the
Hi,
When we use LTO for fortran we may have a mix 32bit and 1bit scalar booleans.
It means we may have conversion of one scalar type to another which confuses
vectorizer because values with different scalar boolean type may get the same
vectype. This patch transforms such conversions into comp
10 matches
Mail list logo