On Tue, 3 May 2016, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> We ICE on the following testcase. There are multiple issues, this patch
> fixes just the ICE part; INTEGER_CST rhs1 is completely valid on COND_EXPR,
> though of course a sign of missed optimization earlier; so we don't need
> to spend too much
Hi!
We ICE on the following testcase. There are multiple issues, this patch
fixes just the ICE part; INTEGER_CST rhs1 is completely valid on COND_EXPR,
though of course a sign of missed optimization earlier; so we don't need
to spend too much time on it, but shouldn't ICE.
Bootstrapped/regtested