subject:"\[PATCH\] Another ldist testcase"

Re: [PATCH] Another ldist testcase

2013-04-08 Thread Richard Biener

On Mon, 8 Apr 2013, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > I was curious whether we don't miscompile the following testcase on 4.8 > branch (-1+0i matches integer_all_onesp), but apparently we don't, because > TYPE_PRECISION on the COMPLEX_TYPE is 0. Anyway, I'd like to check this > into trunk/4.8 branc

[PATCH] Another ldist testcase

2013-04-08 Thread Jakub Jelinek

Hi! I was curious whether we don't miscompile the following testcase on 4.8 branch (-1+0i matches integer_all_onesp), but apparently we don't, because TYPE_PRECISION on the COMPLEX_TYPE is 0. Anyway, I'd like to check this into trunk/4.8 branch, ok? 2013-04-08 Jakub Jelinek * gcc.c-t