Re: [PATCH] Adjust 'malloc' attribute documentation to match implementation

2012-02-24 Thread Richard Guenther
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Tuesday 21 February 2012 10:19:15 Richard Guenther wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >>> On Monday 9 January 2012 10:05:08 Richard Guenther wrote: Since GCC 4.4 applying the malloc attribute to realloc

Re: [PATCH] Adjust 'malloc' attribute documentation to match implementation

2012-02-21 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Tuesday 21 February 2012 10:19:15 Richard Guenther wrote: > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >> On Monday 9 January 2012 10:05:08 Richard Guenther wrote: >>> Since GCC 4.4 applying the malloc attribute to realloc-like >>> functions does not work under the documented constr

Re: [PATCH] Adjust 'malloc' attribute documentation to match implementation

2012-02-21 Thread Richard Guenther
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Monday 9 January 2012 10:05:08 Richard Guenther wrote: >> Since GCC 4.4 applying the malloc attribute to realloc-like >> functions does not work under the documented constraints because >> the contents of the memory pointed to are not pro

Re: [PATCH] Adjust 'malloc' attribute documentation to match implementation

2012-02-20 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Monday 9 January 2012 10:05:08 Richard Guenther wrote: > Since GCC 4.4 applying the malloc attribute to realloc-like > functions does not work under the documented constraints because > the contents of the memory pointed to are not properly transfered > from the realloc argument (or treated as p

Re: [PATCH] Adjust 'malloc' attribute documentation to match implementation

2012-01-11 Thread Richard Guenther
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012, Xinliang David Li wrote: > of course your new version. I have installed it on the trunk. Richard. > thanks, > > David > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 1:31 AM, Richard Guenther wrote: > > On Mon, 9 Jan 2012, Xinliang David Li wrote: > > > >> It looks non-ambiguous to me. > >

Re: [PATCH] Adjust 'malloc' attribute documentation to match implementation

2012-01-10 Thread Xinliang David Li
of course your new version. thanks, David On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 1:31 AM, Richard Guenther wrote: > On Mon, 9 Jan 2012, Xinliang David Li wrote: > >> It looks non-ambiguous to me. > > The new proposed version or the old? > > Richard. > >> David >> >> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:05 AM, Richard Gue

Re: [PATCH] Adjust 'malloc' attribute documentation to match implementation

2012-01-10 Thread Richard Guenther
On Mon, 9 Jan 2012, Xinliang David Li wrote: > It looks non-ambiguous to me. The new proposed version or the old? Richard. > David > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:05 AM, Richard Guenther wrote: > > > > Since GCC 4.4 applying the malloc attribute to realloc-like > > functions does not work under

Re: [PATCH] Adjust 'malloc' attribute documentation to match implementation

2012-01-09 Thread Xinliang David Li
It looks non-ambiguous to me. David On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:05 AM, Richard Guenther wrote: > > Since GCC 4.4 applying the malloc attribute to realloc-like > functions does not work under the documented constraints because > the contents of the memory pointed to are not properly transfered > fro

[PATCH] Adjust 'malloc' attribute documentation to match implementation

2012-01-09 Thread Richard Guenther
Since GCC 4.4 applying the malloc attribute to realloc-like functions does not work under the documented constraints because the contents of the memory pointed to are not properly transfered from the realloc argument (or treated as pointing to anything, like 4.3 behaved). The following adjusts do