On 11/05/14 13:30, jb...@gmx.de wrote:
With LTO enabled it runs just fine (which is the reason for the patch I
suggested):
This is definitely a testing framework problem. The profopt framework
isn't clearing the "additional_whatever" variables. Presumably failure
to clear is specific to a t
On 11/05/14 13:30, jb...@gmx.de wrote:
"Jeff Law" :
On 10/23/14 08:30, jb...@gmx.de wrote:
"Jeff Law" :
On 10/21/14 12:21, jb...@gmx.de wrote:
"Jeff Law" :
On 10/21/14 16:13, Haswell wrote:
The additional source must have the same requirement crossmodule-indircall-1.c
has.
* cros
"Jeff Law" :
>On 10/23/14 08:30, jb...@gmx.de wrote:
>> "Jeff Law" :
>>
>>> On 10/21/14 12:21, jb...@gmx.de wrote:
"Jeff Law" :
> On 10/21/14 16:13, Haswell wrote:
>> The additional source must have the same requirement
>> crossmodule-indircall-1.c has.
>>
>> * crossmodul
On 10/23/14 08:30, jb...@gmx.de wrote:
"Jeff Law" :
On 10/21/14 12:21, jb...@gmx.de wrote:
"Jeff Law" :
On 10/21/14 16:13, Haswell wrote:
The additional source must have the same requirement crossmodule-indircall-1.c
has.
* crossmodule-indircall-1a.c: Add missing requirement.
Why?
"Jeff Law" :
> On 10/21/14 12:21, jb...@gmx.de wrote:
> > "Jeff Law" :
> >> On 10/21/14 16:13, Haswell wrote:
> >>> The additional source must have the same requirement
> >>> crossmodule-indircall-1.c has.
> >>>
> >>> * crossmodule-indircall-1a.c: Add missing requirement.
> >> Why? When used b
On 10/21/14 12:21, jb...@gmx.de wrote:
"Jeff Law" :
On 10/21/14 16:13, Haswell wrote:
The additional source must have the same requirement crossmodule-indircall-1.c
has.
* crossmodule-indircall-1a.c: Add missing requirement.
Why? When used by crossmodule-indircall-1.c we'll have alr
"Jeff Law" :
>On 10/21/14 16:13, Haswell wrote:
>> The additional source must have the same requirement
>> crossmodule-indircall-1.c has.
>>
>> * crossmodule-indircall-1a.c: Add missing requirement.
>Why? When used by crossmodule-indircall-1.c we'll have already tested
>the marker and when
On 10/21/14 16:13, Haswell wrote:
The additional source must have the same requirement crossmodule-indircall-1.c
has.
* crossmodule-indircall-1a.c: Add missing requirement.
Why? When used by crossmodule-indircall-1.c we'll have already tested
the marker and when used by itself, it doe
The additional source must have the same requirement crossmodule-indircall-1.c
has.
* crossmodule-indircall-1a.c: Add missing requirement.
diff -Nur a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-prof/crossmodule-indircall-1a.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-prof/crossmodule-indircall-1a.c
--- a/gcc/testsuit
