Re: [PATCH] Add missing explicit instantiation for std::lower_bound template

2013-02-11 Thread Benjamin De Kosnik
> >> Since commit r195676[1], it looks like > >> libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/hashtable_c++0x.cc is missing an explicit > >> instantiation for std::lower_bound. it's missing an implicit instantiation of std::lower_bound. >>This leads to l

Re: [PATCH] Add missing explicit instantiation for std::lower_bound template

2013-02-06 Thread Dodji Seketeli
Paolo Carlini writes: >> Since commit r195676[1], it looks like >> libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/hashtable_c++0x.cc is missing an explicit >> instantiation for std::lower_bound. This leads to libstdc++.so having >> the symbol for that (missing) instantiation be undefined, thus >> preventing executables

Re: [PATCH] Add missing explicit instantiation for std::lower_bound template

2013-02-05 Thread Paolo Carlini
Hi Dodji, On 02/04/2013 04:53 PM, Dodji Seketeli wrote: Hello, Since commit r195676[1], it looks like libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/hashtable_c++0x.cc is missing an explicit instantiation for std::lower_bound. This leads to libstdc++.so having the symbol for that (missing) instantiation be undefined,

[PATCH] Add missing explicit instantiation for std::lower_bound template

2013-02-04 Thread Dodji Seketeli
Hello, Since commit r195676[1], it looks like libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/hashtable_c++0x.cc is missing an explicit instantiation for std::lower_bound. This leads to libstdc++.so having the symbol for that (missing) instantiation be undefined, thus preventing executables from being linked with libstdc