> >> Since commit r195676[1], it looks like
> >> libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/hashtable_c++0x.cc is missing an explicit
> >> instantiation for std::lower_bound.
it's missing an implicit instantiation of std::lower_bound.
>>This leads to l
Paolo Carlini writes:
>> Since commit r195676[1], it looks like
>> libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/hashtable_c++0x.cc is missing an explicit
>> instantiation for std::lower_bound. This leads to libstdc++.so having
>> the symbol for that (missing) instantiation be undefined, thus
>> preventing executables
Hi Dodji,
On 02/04/2013 04:53 PM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
Hello,
Since commit r195676[1], it looks like
libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/hashtable_c++0x.cc is missing an explicit
instantiation for std::lower_bound. This leads to libstdc++.so having
the symbol for that (missing) instantiation be undefined,
Hello,
Since commit r195676[1], it looks like
libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/hashtable_c++0x.cc is missing an explicit
instantiation for std::lower_bound. This leads to libstdc++.so having
the symbol for that (missing) instantiation be undefined, thus
preventing executables from being linked with libstdc