Re: [PATCH] Add map clauses to libgomp test device-3.f90

2016-11-23 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 08:01:32PM +0300, Alexander Monakov wrote: > On Tue, 15 Nov 2016, Alexander Monakov wrote: > > Yep, I do see new test execution failures with both Intel MIC and PTX > > offloading > > on device-1.f90, device-3.f90 and target2.f90. Here's an actually-tested > > patch > > f

Re: [PATCH] Add map clauses to libgomp test device-3.f90

2016-11-22 Thread Alexander Monakov
On Tue, 15 Nov 2016, Alexander Monakov wrote: > On Tue, 15 Nov 2016, Alexander Monakov wrote: > > Yep, I do see new test execution failures with both Intel MIC and PTX > > offloading > > on device-1.f90, device-3.f90 and target2.f90. Here's an actually-tested > > patch > > for the first two (on

Re: [PATCH] Add map clauses to libgomp test device-3.f90

2016-11-15 Thread Alexander Monakov
On Tue, 15 Nov 2016, Alexander Monakov wrote: > Yep, I do see new test execution failures with both Intel MIC and PTX > offloading > on device-1.f90, device-3.f90 and target2.f90. Here's an actually-tested > patch > for the first two (on target2.f90 there's a different problem). And here's a pa

Re: [PATCH] Add map clauses to libgomp test device-3.f90

2016-11-15 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 07:52:56PM +0300, Alexander Monakov wrote: > On Mon, 14 Nov 2016, Alexander Monakov wrote: > > On Mon, 14 Nov 2016, Martin Jambor wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > yesterday I forgot to send out the following patch. The test > > > libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/examples

Re: [PATCH] Add map clauses to libgomp test device-3.f90

2016-11-15 Thread Alexander Monakov
On Mon, 14 Nov 2016, Alexander Monakov wrote: > On Mon, 14 Nov 2016, Martin Jambor wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > yesterday I forgot to send out the following patch. The test > > libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/examples-4/device-3.f90 was failing > > for me when I was testing the HSA branch merge bu

Re: [PATCH] Add map clauses to libgomp test device-3.f90

2016-11-14 Thread Alexander Monakov
On Mon, 14 Nov 2016, Martin Jambor wrote: > Hi, > > yesterday I forgot to send out the following patch. The test > libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/examples-4/device-3.f90 was failing > for me when I was testing the HSA branch merge but I believe the test > itself is wrong and the failure is

[PATCH] Add map clauses to libgomp test device-3.f90

2016-11-14 Thread Martin Jambor
Hi, yesterday I forgot to send out the following patch. The test libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/examples-4/device-3.f90 was failing for me when I was testing the HSA branch merge but I believe the test itself is wrong and the failure is due to us now adhering to OpenMP 4.5 default mapping of s