On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 9:38 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Richard Biener
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:05 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Patrick Marlier
wrote:
> Hi,
>
On Fri, 6 Dec 2013, H.J. Lu wrote:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IA
>
> IA-32, Intel Architecture, 32-bit
> IA-64, Intel Architecture, 64-bit
And Intel 64 is an implementation of and extension to the 64-bit
extension of IA-32 created by AMD, totally unrelated to IA-64.
Marketing. :-)
Gerald
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:05 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Patrick Marlier
>>> wrote:
Hi,
On 12/05/2013 07:22 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>
>>
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:05 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Patrick Marlier
>>> wrote:
Hi,
On 12/05/2013 07:22 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>
>>
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:05 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Patrick Marlier
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/05/2013 07:22 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
We'd like to add a new -mtune=ia option for x86 to optimize f
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 10:38:27AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:05 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Patrick Marlier
> > wrote:
> >> On 12/05/2013 07:22 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >>>
> >>> We'd like to add a new -mtune=ia option for x86 to optimize for
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:05 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Patrick Marlier
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> On 12/05/2013 07:22 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>
>>> We'd like to add a new -mtune=ia option for x86 to optimize for both
>>> Haswell and Silvermont. Currently, -mtune=ia is alias
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Patrick Marlier
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 12/05/2013 07:22 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>
>> We'd like to add a new -mtune=ia option for x86 to optimize for both
>> Haswell and Silvermont. Currently, -mtune=ia is aliased to -mtune=slm.
>> We will improve it further for Haswell
Hi,
On 12/05/2013 07:22 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
We'd like to add a new -mtune=ia option for x86 to optimize for both
Haswell and Silvermont. Currently, -mtune=ia is aliased to -mtune=slm.
We will improve it further for Haswell and Silvermont. Later, we will
update it to future Intel processors.
A
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 7:22 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>
>> We'd like to add a new -mtune=ia option for x86 to optimize for both
>> Haswell and Silvermont. Currently, -mtune=ia is aliased to -mtune=slm.
>> We will improve it further for Haswell and S
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 7:22 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> We'd like to add a new -mtune=ia option for x86 to optimize for both
> Haswell and Silvermont. Currently, -mtune=ia is aliased to -mtune=slm.
> We will improve it further for Haswell and Silvermont. Later, we will
> update it to future Intel proc
Hi,
We'd like to add a new -mtune=ia option for x86 to optimize for both
Haswell and Silvermont. Currently, -mtune=ia is aliased to -mtune=slm.
We will improve it further for Haswell and Silvermont. Later, we will
update it to future Intel processors. OK for trunk?
Thanks.
H.J.
---
2013-12-0
12 matches
Mail list logo