On 04/03/2019 09:04, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 03:41:33PM +, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
>> > and regtest revealed two code size
>> > regressions because of that. Is -1 vs. 1 the only case of immediate
>> > valid for both "I" and "L" constraints where the former is longer than t
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 12:43:29PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 10:04:01AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > The first one uses constraints and no C code in the output, I believe it is
> > actually more expensive for compile time, because if one just reads what
> > constrain_
On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 10:04:01AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> The first one uses constraints and no C code in the output, I believe it is
> actually more expensive for compile time, because if one just reads what
> constrain_operands needs to do for another constraint, it is quite a lot.
> I've
On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 03:41:33PM +, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
> > and regtest revealed two code size
> > regressions because of that. Is -1 vs. 1 the only case of immediate
> > valid for both "I" and "L" constraints where the former is longer than the
> > latter?
>
> Yes -1 is the only case whi
