Wilco Dijkstra writes:
> Hi Richard,
>
>> Normally we should only put two instructions in the same define_insn
>> if there's a specific ABI or architectural reason for not separating
>> them. Doing it purely for optimisation reasons is going against the
>> general direction of travel. So I think
Hi Richard,
> Normally we should only put two instructions in the same define_insn
> if there's a specific ABI or architectural reason for not separating
> them. Doing it purely for optimisation reasons is going against the
> general direction of travel. So I think the first question is: why
> d
Wilco Dijkstra via Gcc-patches writes:
> Improve GOT addressing by emitting the instructions as a pair. This reduces
> register pressure and improves code quality. With -fPIC codesize improves by
> 0.65% and SPECINT2017 improves by 0.25%.
>
> Passes bootstrap and regress. OK for commit?
Normally
Improve GOT addressing by emitting the instructions as a pair. This reduces
register pressure and improves code quality. With -fPIC codesize improves by
0.65% and SPECINT2017 improves by 0.25%.
Passes bootstrap and regress. OK for commit?
ChangeLog:
2021-05-05 Wilco Dijkstra
* confi