On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> When investigating an issue on arm, I discovered a bug that needs fixing.
>
> If there is no atomic_load pattern for data which is larger than the native
> word size, we try to issue a compare_and_swap loop. Problem is there is no
> check t
When investigating an issue on arm, I discovered a bug that needs fixing.
If there is no atomic_load pattern for data which is larger than the
native word size, we try to issue a compare_and_swap loop. Problem is
there is no check to see if it succeeded or failed. If the compare-swap
loop i
