On Feb 24, 2025, Mike Stump wrote:
> I thought I saw one more needing review.
Thanks, Richard Sandiford reviewed it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-February/676031.html
--
Alexandre Oliva, happy hackerhttps://blog.lx.oliva.nom.br/
Free Software Activist FSFLA co
On Feb 13, 2025, at 1:51 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> Some vect-simd-clone tests fail when targeting ancient x86 variants,
> because the expected transformations only take place with -msse4 or
> higher.
>
> So arrange for these tests to take an -msse4 option on x86, so that
> the expected vect
Some vect-simd-clone tests fail when targeting ancient x86 variants,
because the expected transformations only take place with -msse4 or
higher.
So arrange for these tests to take an -msse4 option on x86, so that
the expected vectorization takes place, but decay to a compile test if
vect.exp wou
