On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 10:49:31AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 09:55:16AM +0100, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote:
> > For some targets uptr is mapped to unsigned int and size_t to unsigned
> > long and sizeof(int)==sizeof(long) holds. Still, these are distinct
> > types
On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 09:55:16AM +0100, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote:
> For some targets uptr is mapped to unsigned int and size_t to unsigned
> long and sizeof(int)==sizeof(long) holds. Still, these are distinct
> types and type checking may fail. Therefore, replace uptr by
> usize/SIZE_T
For some targets uptr is mapped to unsigned int and size_t to unsigned
long and sizeof(int)==sizeof(long) holds. Still, these are distinct
types and type checking may fail. Therefore, replace uptr by
usize/SIZE_T wherever a size_t is expected.
Part of #116957
Cherry picked from LLVM commit 9a15
