Re: [PATCH] [PR86064] split single cross-partition range with nonzero locviews

2018-06-26 Thread Richard Biener
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 10:21 AM Alexandre Oliva wrote: > > On Jun 22, 2018, Jeff Law wrote: > > > On 06/12/2018 08:02 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > >> > >> We didn't split cross-partition ranges in loclists to output a > >> whole-function location expression, but with nonzero locviews, we > >> fo

Re: [PATCH] [PR86064] split single cross-partition range with nonzero locviews

2018-06-26 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Jun 22, 2018, Jeff Law wrote: > On 06/12/2018 08:02 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> >> We didn't split cross-partition ranges in loclists to output a >> whole-function location expression, but with nonzero locviews, we >> force loclists, and then we have to split to avoid cross-partition >> lis

Re: [PATCH] [PR86064] split single cross-partition range with nonzero locviews

2018-06-22 Thread Jeff Law
On 06/12/2018 08:02 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > > We didn't split cross-partition ranges in loclists to output a > whole-function location expression, but with nonzero locviews, we > force loclists, and then we have to split to avoid cross-partition > list entries. > > From: Alexandre Oliva > f

Re: [PATCH] [PR86064] split single cross-partition range with nonzero locviews

2018-06-12 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Jun 12, 2018, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > We didn't split cross-partition ranges in loclists to output a > whole-function location expression, but with nonzero locviews, we > force loclists, and then we have to split to avoid cross-partition > list entries. Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu and i6

[PATCH] [PR86064] split single cross-partition range with nonzero locviews

2018-06-12 Thread Alexandre Oliva
We didn't split cross-partition ranges in loclists to output a whole-function location expression, but with nonzero locviews, we force loclists, and then we have to split to avoid cross-partition list entries. From: Alexandre Oliva for gcc/ChangeLog PR debug/86064 * dwarf2out.