On Thu, 19 Sep 2024, Robin Dapp wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 Sep 2024, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > > The following restores the use of .SELECT_VL for testcases where it
> > > is safe to use even when using SLP. I've for now restricted it
> > > to single-lane SLP plus optimistically allow store-lane no
> On Tue, 17 Sep 2024, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> > The following restores the use of .SELECT_VL for testcases where it
> > is safe to use even when using SLP. I've for now restricted it
> > to single-lane SLP plus optimistically allow store-lane nodes
> > and assume single-lane roots are not widen
On Tue, 17 Sep 2024, Richard Biener wrote:
> The following restores the use of .SELECT_VL for testcases where it
> is safe to use even when using SLP. I've for now restricted it
> to single-lane SLP plus optimistically allow store-lane nodes
> and assume single-lane roots are not widened but at m
The following restores the use of .SELECT_VL for testcases where it
is safe to use even when using SLP. I've for now restricted it
to single-lane SLP plus optimistically allow store-lane nodes
and assume single-lane roots are not widened but at most to
load-lane who should be fine.
v2 fixes laten
