On 2024-09-05 01:02, Jeff Law wrote:
On 9/4/24 1:13 AM, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote:
On 2024-09-03 20:23, Richard Biener wrote:
Am 03.09.2024 um 19:00 schrieb Tamar Christina
:
Hi All,
The meaning of the testcase was changed by passing it -fwrapv. The
reason for
the test failures on
On 9/4/24 1:13 AM, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote:
On 2024-09-03 20:23, Richard Biener wrote:
Am 03.09.2024 um 19:00 schrieb Tamar Christina
:
Hi All,
The meaning of the testcase was changed by passing it -fwrapv. The
reason for
the test failures on some platform was because the test was
On 2024-09-03 20:23, Richard Biener wrote:
Am 03.09.2024 um 19:00 schrieb Tamar Christina :
Hi All,
The meaning of the testcase was changed by passing it -fwrapv. The reason for
the test failures on some platform was because the test was testing some
implementation defined behavior wrt
> Am 03.09.2024 um 19:00 schrieb Tamar Christina :
>
> Hi All,
>
> The meaning of the testcase was changed by passing it -fwrapv. The reason for
> the test failures on some platform was because the test was testing some
> implementation defined behavior wrt INT_MIN in generic code.
>
> Inst
Hi All,
The meaning of the testcase was changed by passing it -fwrapv. The reason for
the test failures on some platform was because the test was testing some
implementation defined behavior wrt INT_MIN in generic code.
Instead of using -fwrapv this just removes the border case from the test so
