On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 4:41 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 04:33:30PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > DW_OP_GNU_variable_value you mean. That's true. But I was talking about
>
> Sure.
>
> > omitting DW_AT_upper_bound which would correspond to int[] vs.
> > a empty location
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 04:33:30PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> DW_OP_GNU_variable_value you mean. That's true. But I was talking about
Sure.
> omitting DW_AT_upper_bound which would correspond to int[] vs.
> a empty location list DW_AT_upper_bound which would correspond to
> int[].
I think
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 12:39 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 12:29:37PM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > > I wonder if it makes sense to disambiguate things from the gcc side
> > > by generating an empty location description for known optimized out
> > > values (the standard see
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 12:29:37PM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > I wonder if it makes sense to disambiguate things from the gcc side
> > by generating an empty location description for known optimized out
> > values (the standard seems to explicitely call that out as a way to
> > say "optimized ou
On 07/19/2018 10:30 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 3:42 PM Tom de Vries wrote:
>>
>> On 07/06/2018 12:28 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 4:12 PM Tom de Vries wrote:
On 07/05/2018 01:39 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 1:25
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 3:42 PM Tom de Vries wrote:
>
> On 07/06/2018 12:28 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 4:12 PM Tom de Vries wrote:
> >>
> >> On 07/05/2018 01:39 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 1:25 PM Tom de Vries wrote:
>
> [ was: Re: [
On 07/06/2018 12:28 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 4:12 PM Tom de Vries wrote:
>>
>> On 07/05/2018 01:39 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 1:25 PM Tom de Vries wrote:
[ was: Re: [testsuite/guality, committed] Prevent optimization of local in
v
On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 12:47 PM Tom de Vries wrote:
>
> On 07/05/2018 01:39 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 1:25 PM Tom de Vries wrote:
> >>
> >> [ was: Re: [testsuite/guality, committed] Prevent optimization of local in
> >> vla-1.c ]
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 02:32:
On 07/05/2018 01:39 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 1:25 PM Tom de Vries wrote:
>>
>> [ was: Re: [testsuite/guality, committed] Prevent optimization of local in
>> vla-1.c ]
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 02:32:27PM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
>>> On 07/03/2018 11:05 AM, Tom de Vr
On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 4:12 PM Tom de Vries wrote:
>
> On 07/05/2018 01:39 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 1:25 PM Tom de Vries wrote:
> >>
> >> [ was: Re: [testsuite/guality, committed] Prevent optimization of local in
> >> vla-1.c ]
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 02:32:2
On 07/05/2018 01:39 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 1:25 PM Tom de Vries wrote:
>>
>> [ was: Re: [testsuite/guality, committed] Prevent optimization of local in
>> vla-1.c ]
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 02:32:27PM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
>>> On 07/03/2018 11:05 AM, Tom de Vr
On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 1:25 PM Tom de Vries wrote:
>
> [ was: Re: [testsuite/guality, committed] Prevent optimization of local in
> vla-1.c ]
>
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 02:32:27PM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > On 07/03/2018 11:05 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > > On 07/02/2018 10:16 AM, Jakub Jeline
[ was: Re: [testsuite/guality, committed] Prevent optimization of local in
vla-1.c ]
On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 02:32:27PM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 07/03/2018 11:05 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > On 07/02/2018 10:16 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 09:44:04AM +0200, Richard B
13 matches
Mail list logo
