On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 7:26 PM Andrew MacLeod wrote:
>
> On 6/7/21 4:40 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 11:15 PM Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> >>
> >> My thoughts are I would put this into trunk, and assuming nothing comes
> >> up over the next couple of days, port it back to GCC1
On 6/7/21 4:40 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 11:15 PM Andrew MacLeod wrote:
My thoughts are I would put this into trunk, and assuming nothing comes
up over the next couple of days, port it back to GCC11 to resolve
100299 and other excessive memory consumption PRs there as w
On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 11:15 PM Andrew MacLeod wrote:
>
> As mentioned earlier, I abstracted the on-entry cache at the beginning
> of stage1. This was to make it easier to port future changes back to
> GCC11 so we could provide alternate representations to deal with memory
> issues, or what have y
As mentioned earlier, I abstracted the on-entry cache at the beginning
of stage1. This was to make it easier to port future changes back to
GCC11 so we could provide alternate representations to deal with memory
issues, or what have you.
This patch introduces a sparse representation of the cac
